What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate how surprising it is for expressions from a constructor alphabet to fall within specific experimental corridors in Quantum Traction Theory.

July 5, 2026Open Access

The Constructor Alphabet Under a Null Model: Trials-Corrected Significance for the QTT Corpus

Key Points

To evaluate how surprising it is for expressions from a constructor alphabet to fall within specific experimental corridors in Quantum Traction Theory.
Freezing a constructor alphabet based on Quantum Traction Theory corpus.
Applying a trials-correction engine for parameter-free numerical physics claims.
Conducting audits of expression complexity against experimental corridors.
For alpha inverse at corridor width, the corrected complexity gives K* alpha inverse ≈ 11.54.
Neutrino mass-squared ratio audit yields K* nu ≈ 3.51, indicating corridor evidence is void.
Numerical closeness to percent-level corridors must depend on independent source enumeration rather than simple proximity.

Abstract

A trials-correction engine for parameter-free numerical physics claims. This record freezes a constructor alphabet for the Quantum Traction Theory corpus and asks a plain statistical question: if a legal expression may be built from the printed alphabet, how surprising is it that some expression lands inside a given experimental corridor? The central audit objects are \ K=N ₋₄₀ₕ₄ₒ+N ₎₏₄ₑ₀ₓ₎ₑₒ, K^ (x, w): \; E[N (K, w) =1, \] where \ (K\) is expression complexity and \ (K^\) is the complexity at which one chance expression is expected inside target corridor \ (w\). The binding row rule is \ K ₑ₎ₖ K^ (x, w) the corridor agreement is void as evidence. \ Any separate source theorem, finite enumeration, or forward prediction must then stand on its own provenance rather than on numerical closeness. The frozen grammar is hashed before the corpus-wide audit: \ SHA256 (A) = a76635710034818ef071e885c351a88b56afd46ed78b706016ef3829493a3e27. \ The corrected executable receipt gives \ N ₃₈ₒₓ₈₍₂ₓ (K=5) =31, 425, N ₃₈ₒₓ₈₍₂ₓ (K5) =32, 317. \ The pilot cards print both sides of the audit. For \ (^-1=137. 035999166\) at the CODATA-width corridor \ (w=1. 610^-10\), the corrected receipt gives \ K^^-₁ 11. 54. \ For the neutrino mass-squared ratio at a one-percent corridor, it gives \ K^_ 3. 51. \ So the fine-structure corridor can remain protective if the corpus expression audits below the crossover, while the percent-level neutrino corridor is void as corridor evidence under this alphabet. That neutrino row must be judged by its independent source-word enumeration and forward test, not by percent-level closeness. The release includes the paper PDF and a reconstruction ZIP containing the LaTeX source, the standard-library Python engine, the pilot Enumeration Cards, render audit, metadata, and SHA-256 manifest. Related QTT anchors: Main book concept DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 17527179 Artian Keystone Audit: 10. 5281/zenodo. 21141060 Newton's constant source ledger: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20057430 qtt-verify: 10. 5281/zenodo. 21138431

Read Full Paperexternally

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper