Climate change is amplifying heat-related health risks, making heat health risk assessment increasingly important for sustainable urban development. However, current studies still face three challenges: (1) macro-scale and fine-scale assessments remain weakly linked; (2) nighttime heat health risk has received limited attention; and (3) dominant factor identification remains insufficient, especially within the Local Climate Zone (LCZ) framework. To address these gaps, this study developed a hazard–exposure–vulnerability-based, multi-scale framework for assessing nighttime heat health risk in Shandong Province, China. At the macro scale, MODIS nighttime land surface temperature (1 km) was used to characterize heat hazard, and district-level risk was assessed by integrating socio-statistical data. Hotspot analysis was then applied to identify high-risk clusters and select cities for fine-scale assessment. At the fine scale, SDGSAT-1 thermal infrared data (30 m) were used to characterize intra-urban nighttime heat hazard, and block-level risk was assessed by integrating socioeconomic and urban infrastructure data. Dominant risk factors were further identified for each spatial unit. Results show that (1) at the macro scale, high nighttime heat health risk districts are concentrated mainly in southern Shandong and major urban cores; (2) at the fine scale, overall risk is higher in inland cities than in the coastal city, and the inland cities show similar spatial patterns; (3) at both district and block units, higher risk levels are associated with more complex dominant factor configurations; and (4) compact high- and mid-rise zones (LCZ 1–2) are mainly characterized by multiple dominant factors, whereas open low-rise/sparsely built zones (LCZ 6/9) are mainly characterized by no dominant factor. This study provides a multi-level perspective for heat-risk governance, offers a scientific basis for both macro-scale policy formulation and fine-scale intervention, and contributes to more sustainable and resilient cities.
Tan et al. (Tue,) studied this question.