Abstract This article examines outsourcing agreements and their impact on irregular migration and compares them with current plans under discussion at both the national and European level, such as return hubs for the repatriation of rejected asylum seekers to third countries. It argues that the “demotivating” effect of such externalization agreements has yet to be empirically substantiated, as these deals misjudge fundamental migration dynamics.
Judith Kohlenberger (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: