This article presents a critical-propositional analysis of Raoul Bianchetti’s Aionic Loop Protocol – LASO, Informational Spin, and VTT–ASTRO Framework, considered within the broader context of the Discrete Viscous Time Theory (VTT). The study examines the conceptual, mathematical, cosmological, and informational structure of the analyzed article in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), especially with its modal axioms, cosmogonic theorem, phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, and cosmological Eras. The analysis argues that VTT offers a significant field of dialogue with TO due to its emphasis on informational coherence, adaptive loops, informational spin, critical informational mass, temporal viscosity, plasma dynamics, artificial intelligence, consciousness, and cosmological anomalies. At the same time, the article identifies relevant points of tension, particularly regarding the ontological status of viscous time, the grounding of information, the modal necessity of the Nothing and the Infinite, the requirement of boundaries, triangular observation, prior composition, and the TO definition of transcendent substance as knowledge/information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The study proposes that VTT may be most compatible with TO when interpreted not as an absolute theory of origin, but as a post-originary operational model of informational dynamics within an already constituted universe. In this sense, TO provides the modal foundation of existence, while VTT may contribute models of coherence, bifurcation, feedback, and informational organization. This analytical text was prepared with analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Viscous Time Theory; Raoul Bianchetti; Aionic Loop Protocol; LASO; Informational Spin; VTT–ASTRO; Discrete Viscous Time Theory; informational coherence; transcendent substance; atomic radiation; modal ontology; cosmology; artificial intelligence; consciousness; plasma dynamics; critical-propositional analysis.
Cabannas et al. (Thu,) studied this question.