Every year, tens of thousands of academic papers worldwide are retracted due to data manipulation, result beautification, selective reporting, and error tailoring. Public and academic opinions have long attributed this chaos to the ethical failures of individual researchers, systematically evading the structural root cause permeating the modern scientific architecture: homogenous data fraud in the global research community is an inevitable replication and systemic backlash of legalized perjury within top-level physical paradigms. Based on the True-Circle Self-Consistency (TCSC) axiomatic framework and the 64-dimensional compact torus topology of Yuanxian Theory (YXT/YD-T64), this paper rigorously defines "Structural Perjury" as a systematic cognitive corruption triggered by inherent dimensional truncation, information loss, and artificial parameter padding, operating entirely independent of subjective malice. Mainstream paradigms such as the Standard Model and Lambda-CDM cosmology rely on 19 particle parameters and dozens of adjustable cosmological settings to retroactively domesticate theories and match empirical data, creating a legalized perjury loop where "fragmented theory + artificial parameters + algorithmic fitting = scientific truth. " As top-level physics packages parameter tuning as model optimization, lower-level research naturally mimics this behavior by manipulating empirical data to forge conclusions. These two operations are mathematically isomorphic, differing only in academic hierarchy and naming privileges. Utilizing a rational-agent game-theoretic model, this paper proves that the parameter-fitting paradigm constructs an adverse selection mechanism of academic incentives, wherein unaltered raw data is inevitably rejected due to poor fitting, while fabricated data secures academic validation, rendering data manipulation the rational optimal strategy for researchers. Relying on YXT's core constant specification, we demonstrate that all low-dimensional adjustable parameters are artificial patches for missing high-dimensional information rather than intrinsic cosmic properties. The Inherent Whole-Fraction Constant (deltaYXT = (sqrt (5) -1) /2 = 0. 618. . . ) acts as the universal topological ground-state unit (Substance, or "Ti"), while the low-dimensional fine-structure constant (alphaFSC) emerges as its projected derivative (Function, or "Yong"), completely locking the zero-parameter ontological rigidity. Finally, we establish the sole curative solution: replacing parametric soft science with YXT zero-parameter rigid topology, fundamentally eradicating the institutional soil and incentives for academic misconduct. 全球学术界每年数万篇论文因数据篡改、结果美化、选择性报告、误差修饰而被撤稿。公众与学术舆论长期将乱象归因于研究者个体道德缺陷, 却系统性回避了贯穿现代科学体系的结构性病根: 全球科研圈同质化数据造假, 是顶层物理范式合法造假的必然复刻与连锁反噬。 本文基于元宪理论 (YXT/YD-T64) TCSC真圆自洽公理体系与六十四维紧致环面拓扑本体论, 严格定义“结构性伪证”: 无需主观恶意, 仅由理论先天维度残缺、信息亏损、人工参数补全所催生的系统性认知篡改。现代标准模型、Lambda-CDM宇宙学等主流范式, 依靠19项粒子自由参数、数十项宇宙学可调参数, 通过后验拟合反向驯化理论、匹配观测数据, 形成“残缺理论+人工参数+算法拟合=科学真理”的合法化造假闭环。顶层物理将参数微调包装为模型优化, 底层科研自然模仿为数据修饰凑取结论, 二者数学结构完全同构, 仅学术层级与命名权限存在差异。 本文通过理性经济人博弈模型证明: 参数拟合范式构建了一套学术奖惩逆向选择机制, 真实原始数据必然被低拟合度拒稿, 修饰拟合数据必然获得学术认可, 数据造假由此成为科研人员的理性最优策略。依托YXT最新核心常数规范, 本文阐明: 所有低维可调参数均为T64高维拓扑降维投影的信息缺失补丁, 而非宇宙内禀物理量;本源未缺分常数 (deltaYXT = (sqrt (5) -1) /2 = 0. 618. . . ) 为全域拓扑基态单元 (对应本体论之“体”), 低维精细结构常数 (alphaFSC) 为其体用投影衍生量 (对应本体论之“用”), 彻底锁死零参数本体论刚性。最终本文确立唯一根治方案: 以YXT零参数拓扑刚性科学全面取代参数拟合软科学, 从公理、拓扑、形式化层面彻底消灭学术造假的存在土壤与制度动机。
Zhenyuan Acharya (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: