HRMARS - Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an important driver of educational digitalization, yet its application in compulsory education physical education (PE) remains uneven and insufficiently examined. This mixed-methods study investigated the current level of AI utilization, the barriers to implementation, and practical improvement strategies among 50 PE teachers from eight public primary and junior high schools in Licheng District, Jinan City, China. Quantitative data were collected through a structured questionnaire measuring AI familiarity, training exposure, usage frequency, perceived value, perceived difficulty, self-rated competence, and school support. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulation analysis were conducted using SPSS. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 25 purposively selected teachers and analyzed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework. Results showed that AI utilization was low: 54% of teachers had never used AI tools in PE teaching, and 52% had received no AI-related training. Although teachers perceived AI as useful for assessment, personalized instruction, motivation, and teaching efficiency, they also reported high levels of difficulty related to inadequate equipment, insufficient PE-specific training, limited operational skills, privacy concerns, and lack of peer examples. A cross-tabulation showed that teachers who had received AI training were much more likely to report actual AI use than those without training, indicating that the intention-behavior gap was primarily shaped by facilitating conditions rather than teacher resistance. Interpreted through the Technology Acceptance Model and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, the findings suggest that AI adoption in PE depends on environmental fit, practical training, and institutional support. The study recommends embedded professional learning in gymnasium settings, equitable PE technology investment, clear data governance, and school-based AI champion teachers.
Zhiqiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: