What question did this study set out to answer?

The study aims to explore methods for verifying AI actions to regulators without granting system access.

July 13, 2026Open Access

How Do You Prove to a Regulator What Your AI Did Without Giving Them Access to the System?

MIMicky IronsMaryland Institute College of Art

Key Points

The study aims to explore methods for verifying AI actions to regulators without granting system access.
Developed an offline-verifiable evidence bundle for regulators
Utilized public keys for verification without connectivity
Implemented a post-quantum signed audit ledger for tamper-proofing
Every action is sealed in the audit ledger upon execution
Tampering attempts break signatures, revealing the extent of the tampering
Mickai's system allows regulators to verify AI actions securely without direct access

Abstract

Prove it with an offline-verifiable evidence bundle a regulator checks using public keys alone, no system access and no connectivity. Every action was sealed the moment it happened to a post-quantum signed audit ledger, so any tampering breaks the signatures and shows exactly where.Originally published at https://mickai.co.uk/articles/proving-to-a-regulator-what-your-ai-did-without-giving-them-system-access. Mickai is a Sovereign Intelligence Operating System; the Open Audit Record signs every artificial intelligence action before it executes, post-quantum and offline-verifiable. 104 filed UK patent applications, Mickai LTD (Companies House 17166618).

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper