Mainstream quantum mechanics and atomic physics have long relied on the Schrödinger equation, spherical harmonics, and probabilistic cloud assumptions to precisely fit atomic orbital morphology, energy level distributions, and spectral data, achieving remarkable computational effectiveness. However, they have consistently lacked an ontological morphogenetic mechanism. For over a century, the quantum framework has been able to answer “what is the distribution of orbitals,” but has never been able to answer: why must orbitals exhibit their specific geometric forms? Where do the structural constraints originate? How are wave-particle modalities ontologically generated? Grounded in the PFUSRC axiomatic system of the 45° triple coaxial bicone as the unique steady-state geometry of the cosmos, this paper completes a topological ontological reconstruction of microscopic atomic structure. It rigorously demonstrates that the atom is not a spherically symmetric stochastic probability system, but rather a microscopically solidified 45° triple coaxial biconical interlayer oscillation steady-state structure. All s/p/d/f orbital petal morphologies, spatial nodal surfaces, energy level splittings, and symmetry breakings are not solutions of equations, but geometric necessities generated by biconical nested topology, interlayer angle constraints, and the 12/11 boundary gauge ratio. This paper rigorously distinguishes between two cognitive levels: quantum mechanics belongs to the observational fitting, statistical representation, and mathematical approximation system; PFUSRC atomic topological morphogenesis belongs to the structural origin, topological generation, and ontological mechanism system. The two are fully data-compatible, completely nested in hierarchy, and entirely non-isomorphic in ontology—there is no conflict, only a paradigmatic gap between “representational fitting” and “ontological generation.” This paper further clarifies: the electron is neither a classical particle nor a mechanical wave, but a steady-state node of the four-dimensional flowvariable field topologically latched at the three-dimensional interface. Wave-particle duality is a projective observational effect, not an intrinsic property of the electron. The spherical symmetry of the s-orbital is a time-averaged observational illusion; the instantaneous intrinsic structure of the atom is always a directional biconical configuration. The atom possesses an inherent topological density gradient: dense along the conical axis, sparse in lateral regions the projective distribution is inherently non-uniform. The uniform orbital image in mainstream textbooks is the result of long-term integration smoothing. This paper introduces the 2021 Science σ-hole subatomic direct imaging experiment and the homonuclear diatomic laser-induced dissociation electron localization experiment, demonstrating from real-space observation that the atom exhibits asymmetric conical charge distribution and axial–lateral density magnitude differences, in full agreement with the topological projection predictions of the triple biconical model—piercing through the theoretical blind zone of mainstream symmetric assumptions. This paper redefines the essence of chemical bonding: chemical bonds are not electron orbital overlap couplings, but topological alignment, anchor interlocking, and steady-state co-construction between atomic biconical interlayers. The electron serves only as an interfacial marker node of the latched structure. Four experimentally falsifiable unique topological predictions are proposed, completing the full paradigmatic transition from mathematical fitting and phenomenological description to geometric generation and experimental verification in microscopic atomic systems.
Zhenmin Wang (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: