Abstract Building syntactically annotated corpora, such as treebanks, for historical languages is a challenging yet vital task in digital humanities, as it underpins linguistic analysis and facilitates a range of interdisciplinary research. However, the scarcity of annotated data and the need for extensive expertise in historical linguistics make this process particularly demanding. In this study, we explore the potential of cross-lingual natural language processing (NLP) techniques as a semiautomatic solution for treebank construction in low-resource historical languages. We use Middle High German (MHG) as a case study. Leveraging the linguistic continuity and structural similarities between MHG and Modern German (MG), we effectively utilize the extensive MG treebank resources to develop a constituency parsing system tailored for MHG. Specifically, to design a semiautomatic system that integrates automatic annotation with manual validation, we explore two cross-lingual transfer techniques: zero-shot transfer and delexicalization; the latter removes lexical information to focus on syntactic structure. In our experiments, we first train parsers on MG treebanks, and then transfer them to MHG using the two cross-lingual transfer techniques. The delexicalization method achieves a parsing performance of 67.3 per cent in terms of F1-score. This performance significantly surpasses the zero-shot cross-lingual method by a margin of 28.6 percentage points. These investigations validate the effectiveness and feasibility of cross-lingual transfer techniques for historical language treebank construction. This study highlights the potential of NLP tools to streamline the semiautomatic annotation process, reducing the reliance on extensive linguistic expertise and manual effort, and paving the way for broader applications in digital humanities research.
Nie et al. (Wed,) studied this question.