Building facades are highly exposed envelope components whose degradation affects durability, habitability, urban image, and maintenance planning. Several studies address facade anomalies and service-life prediction. However, a need remains for integrated, reproducible procedures that combine visual inspection, taxonomic classification, and statistical analysis within a single framework. This research develops and validates a standardized methodology for the assessment of facade pathologies in urban buildings. The proposed framework is structured into sequential phases: documentary research, systematic visual inspection, photographic recording, damage classification, facade mapping, standardized inspection sheets, database generation, statistical analysis, and cluster-based interpretation of damage patterns. The methodology was validated through an urban case study in Valencia, Spain, where 168 building facades were inspected and 1600 damage were identified, classified, mapped, and digitized. The collected data were analysed according to building age, environmental exposure, and affected facade units. Soiling due to differential washing was the most frequent damage type, with 295 cases. Buildings constructed between 1930 and 1960 concentrated the highest number of recorded cases (639), while the wall area near ground level was the most affected facade unit (499 cases). K-means analysis retained a three-cluster solution, with a Silhouette Score of 0.65 and a BSS/TSS ratio of 86.13%. In addition, K-means cluster analysis was applied to classify damage types according to their frequency after Z-score standardization and validation through Silhouette Score and BSS/TSS metrics. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework enables homogeneous data collection, reproducible classification, and diagnostic interpretation of recurrent facade damage. Beyond the specific findings of the Valencia case study, the main contribution of this work is the development of a transferable assessment framework that can support preventive maintenance protocols, inspection planning, and evidence-based conservation strategies in other urban contexts.
Barelles-Vicente et al. (Fri,) studied this question.