This paper presents the complete internal reconstruction of the Chronoflux framework from covariant continuity. Beginning with a future-directed conserved temporal current, it separates invariant temporal density from frame-relative drift, recovers the ideal transport equations through a minimal constrained action, establishes symmetric hyperbolicity and stable inverse evolution on the admitted branch, and derives a state-dependent response metric from the quadratic principal density. Equality between the recovered response metric and the carrier metric remains an explicit fixed-point condition, while the Einstein source form and its dimensionful coupling are treated as separate selection and calibration obligations. The physical derivation is accompanied by a structural recovery theorem for a finite typed theory graph. Each scientific object retains its mathematical setting, dependencies, assumptions, claim status, Admissibility, Recoverability and Persistence conditions, return path and exact obstruction boundary. The realised Chronoflux Atlas contains 10 primary descendance tiers, 33 sectors, 437 logical branches and 5,400 path-distinct scientific authorities. Dictionary Graph Objects were adopted because the breadth of the programme made conventional manuscript-level management insufficient. The framework spans many interdependent physical sectors, shared definitions, mathematical branches, revisions and publication lineages. Recent Chronoflux papers were therefore brought into the common object structure and reconciled against the governing core. Corrections, revised assumptions and clarified boundaries admitted within one branch could then be traced through their dependencies and reflected consistently across the recently updated publication set. The resulting object model provides a controlled means of preserving scientific identity across papers while preventing changes in presentation from silently altering governing mathematical authority. A reader-facing implementation of the compiled model is being prepared for separate release. I apologise for any confusion caused by earlier references to internal identifiers or document-management processes without a clear explanation of their scientific purpose. The claim of full recovery has a precise boundary. It establishes complete internal reconstruction of the declared framework, not universal empirical confirmation, unique determination of every constitutive function or the removal of explicitly stated geometric and observational gates.
Roy Herbert (2026) studied this question.