A 12-lead ECG-based artificial intelligence model accurately detected reduced ejection fraction (AUC 0.92), midrange EF (AUC 0.76), and HFpEF (AUC 0.73) in an external validation cohort.
Observational (n=208,123)
Yes
Does an ECG-based artificial intelligence model accurately detect left ventricular dysfunction and HFpEF?
An ECG-based artificial intelligence tool can accurately detect left ventricular dysfunction and HFpEF using 12-lead or single-lead ECGs, providing a potential low-cost screening method.
Effect estimate: AUC 0.92 for rEF, 0.76 for mEF, 0.73 for HFpEF (12-lead model, external validation)
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) often present with early signs that are frequently overlooked or attributed to other conditions. This study proposes a novel, externally validated artificial intelligence (AI) tool using ECG data (ECG-AI) for the simultaneous detection of subtypes of LV dysfunction and HFpEF. METHODS: Two ECG-AI models, using 12-lead or single-lead ECG, were developed using data from Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist and University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC) to classify ECGs into 4 categories: reduced LV ejection fraction (rEF; EF<40), midrange EF (mEF; 40≤mEF<50), HFpEF, and controls (no LV dysfunction or HFpEF). Next, a boosting algorithm was used to incorporate clinical risk factors. Finally, the models were independently validated on pediatric data from UTHSC. RESULTS: The Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist cohort included 1 078 198 digital ECGs from 165 243 patients (5% rEF, 8% mEF, 2% HFpEF), and the UTHSC external validation cohort comprised 72 832 ECGs from 42 880 patients (1% rEF, 1% mEF, 1% HFpEF). For the 12-lead (Lead-I) ECG-AI model, areas under the curve for rEF/mEF/HFpEF were 0.90/0.81/0.80 (0.89/0.78/0.75) in the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist holdout data and 0.92/0.76/0.73 (0.90/0.75/0.74) in the UTHSC data. Clinical data-only machine-learning models lacked generalizability; clinical + ECG-AI models did not show any significant improvement compared with ECG-alone models. With 8418 ECGs (142 cases, 8276 controls) from UTHSC pediatric data, the 12-lead model achieved areas under the curve of 0.97/0.71/0.64 for rEF/mEF/HFpEF, and the Lead I model had areas under the curve of 0.94/0.77/0.67. CONCLUSIONS: ECG-AI can accurately detect LV dysfunction and HFpEF even from single-lead ECG, enabling potential low-cost screening.
Karabayir et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=208,123). ECG-based artificial intelligence (ECG-AI) model vs. Clinical data-only models was evaluated on Detection of reduced LV ejection fraction (rEF), midrange EF (mEF), and HFpEF (AUC 0.92 for rEF, 0.76 for mEF, 0.73 for HFpEF (12-lead model, external validation)). A 12-lead ECG-based artificial intelligence model accurately detected reduced ejection fraction (AUC 0.92), midrange EF (AUC 0.76), and HFpEF (AUC 0.73) in an external validation cohort.