The convex blazed grating is a key dispersive component in high-performance spectrometers, offering advantages such as a broad operating wavelength range, uniform dispersion, high diffraction efficiency, and the ability to achieve a large field of view. With the popularization of spectral detection technology and the ever-increasing demand for specialization, its design and fabrication technologies have drawn considerable attention in the field. This paper systematically reviews the development history of convex blazed grating design theory, from early scalar diffraction theory to the current mainstream rigorous vector methods, including rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA), the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method, and commercial software such as Gsolver and PCGrate, and summarizes the applicable scenarios and limitations of each method. In terms of fabrication techniques, we comprehensively survey three typical technology routes—mechanical ruling, holographic ion beam etching, and electron beam lithography—covering their principles and progress, and analyze their respective merits and drawbacks in terms of precision, operating waveband, groove profile flexibility, and production capacity through comparative analysis. On this basis, we highlight recent breakthroughs achieved via electron beam lithography in blaze angle control and high-aspect-ratio etching for convex blazed gratings spanning from the ultraviolet to the very-long-wave infrared band; the diffraction efficiency has exceeded 80%, and such gratings have been successfully applied in aerospace engineering projects. Finally, this paper summarizes the current challenges facing convex blazed grating technology and provides an outlook on future development trends, including fabrication uniformity on curved substrates, large-area high-precision manufacturing, and design–process co-optimization, with the aim of offering a systematic reference for researchers and engineers in related fields.
Yao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: