This paper examines the configuration of South Africa’s science, technology and innovation (STI) policymaking, advisory and evaluation capabilities in the post‑apartheid era, responding to calls for deeper analysis of evidence‑in‑use. The research question probed is: How have institutional histories and sector‑specific developments shaped the country’s ability to generate, mobilise and apply evidence in support of policy learning? The analysis is structured around four case studies – institutionalization of STI measurement, policy advice and evaluation; the HIV/AIDS crisis; the Square Kilometre Array (SKA); and the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) – each refracting strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and risks within the national system of innovation. The cases reveal a system characterised by both resilience and fragmentation: strong indicator and evaluation infrastructures coexist with uneven advisory autonomy, variable political commitment to evidence, and inconsistent cross‑domain learning. The paper argues that strengthening South Africa’s STI policymaking, advisory and evaluation capability nexus requires more autonomous advisory bodies, milestone‑based review and evaluation (“decision gates”) for major projects, and institutional mechanisms that enable knowledge brokerage across sectors. These findings offer lessons for countries seeking to balance expertise, politics and public accountability in STI governance.
Human Sciences Research Council (Thu,) studied this question.