Abstract Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a clinical syndrome characterised by a sudden deterioration of kidney function. It is common and usually occurs as a complication of severe illness or major surgery. Despite the high risk of complications and a decade of improvement initiatives in the UK, little is known about the quality of post-discharge AKI care. Our population-based cohort study investigated adherence to guideline-recommended post-AKI care in general practices in England. Methods Using English hospital admission data (2017–2021), we created a cohort of discharged patients (≥ 18 years) with a hospital diagnostic code of AKI. Using linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum primary care data, we examined percentages of AKI episodes meeting the criteria of 14 guideline-recommended post-AKI care indicators, covering: AKI coding in primary care, post-discharge primary care contacts, kidney health and blood pressure monitoring, and guideline-indicated prescribing. Variations of indicator adherence according to patient characteristics were quantified using binomial mixed regression. Results 209,222 patients (48.0% females; mean age 74.1 years) were included, representing 279,187 AKI inpatient episodes. Only 19.5% (95% CI 18.5–20.5) of episodes had AKI coded in primary care within 30 days of discharge, while 72.6% (95% CI 71.8–73.4) had a documented contact with general practice. At 90 ± 30 days after discharge, serum creatinine was measured in 34.2% (95% CI 33.7–34.8) of episodes, blood pressure in 34.6% (95% CI 34.0-35.1), and albumin-creatinine ratio in 4.2% (95% CI 4.0-4.4). Testing was less common amongst younger patients and those without comorbid conditions. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor prescribing rates were low in patients likely to benefit. Conclusions There are multiple missed opportunities for improving post-AKI care. Rates of measuring albuminuria were particularly low, despite its strong association with subsequent kidney and cardiovascular events. The limited post-AKI clinical activity amongst younger patients and those without comorbidities undermines the prevention and early intervention of chronic kidney diseases. Clearer discharge arrangements, including case-specific guidance on discharge summaries, and the development and evaluation of concerted implementation strategies spanning secondary and primary care are needed.
Mok et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: