What does this research mean for the field?

Understanding the variety and institutional flexibility ('backlash allowance') of Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) principles is essential for effectively governing future international economic liberalization. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.SYNTHESIS. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

To examine the historical evolution, diverse structural typologies, and institutional flexibility of the Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) principle in international trade governance.

August 19, 2026Journal of World Trade0 citations

Ups and Downs of the Variety of MFN: What’s Next?

SHShintaro Hamanaka

Key Points

To examine the historical evolution, diverse structural typologies, and institutional flexibility of the Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) principle in international trade governance.
Categorized MFN provisions into five structural varieties: multilateral, regional, bilateral (third-party), non-party (automatic), and unilateral.
Conducted a conceptual policy review assessing the historical waves of trade liberalization and theoretical mechanisms of institutional flexibility ('backlash allowance').
Demonstrates that MFN provisions have historically driven equitable economic liberalization across distinct governance formats with varying levels of adaptability.
Identifies institutional flexibility as an essential design feature to prevent political backlash without compromising the integrity of trade commitments.
Evaluates future trade architecture to determine which MFN mechanisms can best navigate complex global economic challenges.

Abstract

We all know that the Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) is the cornerstone of international economic governance, especially trade governance. Yet, policymakers and scholars of late have paid relatively little attention to its variety and evolution. Since MFN is not only a fundamental principle but also a key device to spur economic liberalization in an equitable manner, we should renew our interest in it. With the five types of MFN in mind (multilateral, regional, bilateral third-party, non-party automatic, and unilateral), this paper will first examine the historical ups and downs of economic liberalization spurred by the MFN. Then, from a theoretical standpoint, we will discuss the ‘backlash allowance’ or institutional flexibility of MFN, which we should properly take advantage of, but not abuse. The paper will finally consider which type of MFN is likely to be the key device for the governance of the complex international economy in the future.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper