Background Assessing instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) is an integral diagnostic process for cognitive decline due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). While there are questionnaire-based and performance-based IADL measures, there is no clear consensus on the best methodology for a preclinical population. Objective We aimed to compare performance-based and questionnaire-based IADL measures and investigate whether IADL measures differently predict cognition. Methods One hundred and sixty-one cognitively unimpaired participants (mean age=70.69 ± 6.33 years; 62% female) completed performance-based IADL measures (i.e., Harvard Automated Phone Task APT; Czaja Functional Assessment Battery CFAB), questionnaire-based IADL measures (i.e., Cognitive Function Index CFI; The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living-Prevention Instrument ADCS ADL-PI, also completed by study partners), and cognitive assessments. Separate cross-sectional linear regressions were used to determine (1) whether IADL questionnaires predicted performance-based measures, (2) whether IADL assessments predicted cognition. Results Greater impairment on participant self-reported questionnaires (CFI and ADCS ADL-PI) were associated with worse performance on the CFAB automated teller machine task (R 2 = 0.36, p = 0.010; R 2 = 0.44, p = 0.003). Worse performance on the APT primary care physician task and greater impairment on participant self-reported CFI were associated with worse executive functioning (R 2 = 0.13, p = 0.003; R 2 = 0.06, p = 0.035) and slower processing speed (R 2 = 0.15, p = 0.009; R 2 = 0.22, p < 0.001). Greater impairment on the participant self-reported CFI was the only assessment associated with worse memory scores (R 2 = 0.14, p = 0.005). Conclusions Among cognitively unimpaired older adults, few questionnaire-based IADL questionnaires were associated with performance-based measures. There was variability within and across IADL assessments’ associations with cognition, suggesting that not all IADL assessments are interchangeable.
LaCasse et al. (2026) studied this question.