Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper analyzes the problem of the low practical efficiency of modern large language models (LLMs). We argue that the limiting factor is not a limit of the technology itself, but the organization of reasoning and the architectural role assigned to the language model. We claim no novelty for the "executor — overseer" scheme: analogous configurations have been described in the literature on multi-agent and self-verifying systems, and the field observation presented here is treated as an empirical illustration of a particular case of a more general hypothesis. The main contribution consists of four parts. (1) Diagnosis: a modern LLM is interpreted as the implementation of predominantly a single functional zone — the speech zone. Mind as a process is amodal and not bound to natural language; language is merely one of the serializers operated by the speech zone. (2) An architectural framework: a zonal-modular architecture with an explicit control circuit and with memory moved out into separate addressable zones — together with an ontogenetic program for its formation: zones and connections are grown in stages, in a sequence reproducing the stages of human cognitive development, with verification gates between stages, an offline consolidation phase ("sleep"), and an upbringing (alignment) stage built into the ontogeny with a graduation gate. (3) Experimental verification of two mechanisms of this program. Experiment 1 (training small transformers from scratch, two synthetic domains, four arms): staged formation with worked solutions and gates outperforms training on a shuffled corpus at an equal budget (+0.11 and +0.17 final-exam accuracy), and the accuracy gap between the training set and the exam falls from ~0.2 to ~0 — the model stores the rule rather than memorized answers. Experiment 2 (an agentic task stream): the cost of linearly accumulated context grows quadratically in the agent's lifetime horizon, while the cost of periodic consolidation grows linearly, at equal answer quality; the break-even point is reached already at short horizons. (4) A motivating field observation on a real engineering task, from which the hypothesis is derived. In this optic, modern LLMs are merely the first, speech zone of the future architecture; a full-fledged artificial mind requires building out the remaining zones operating outside language, a correct memory architecture, a coordinating circuit operating in an amodal medium, and a staged ontogeny with verification gates.
Dmitriy Borzov (2026) studied this question.