Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Previous data have shown that apo-E HDL, a lipoprotein containing only the E apoprotein, bind to fibroblast cell surface receptors with a higher affinity than do the apo-€3-containing low density lipoproteins (LDL).The enhanced affinity of apo-E NDL, results from multiple receptor binding (four receptors per HDL, particle).To study the molecular interaction of the E apoprotein with the lipoprotein receptors, apo-E was formed in a complex with dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine vesicles, and the equilibrium dissociation constants (&) for the binding of these complexes with the receptor were determined.In the dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine apoprotein complexes, the ratio of active apo-E, which was capable of receptor binding, to inactive apo-E, which was made incapable of receptor binding by acetoacetylation of the lysine residues, was varied.No differences were noted in the physicochemical properties of the complexes formed with either the active apo-E, inactive apo-E, or different ratios of the two.The complexes had a molecular weight of 760,000 and contained approximately 4 apo-E molecules/disk.Complexes which contained 4 active apo-E molecules bound with a & of 0.10 X IO-' M, a binding affinity similar to that of apo-E HDL, ( K d = 0.12 X lo-' M).Reduction in the number of active apo-E molecules per complex resulted in a reduction in binding affinity and an increase in the number of disks bound per cell.Complexes with 1 active and 3 inactive apo-E molecules/disk bound with an affinity (& --2.6 x IO-' M)similar to the binding affinity of LDL (& --2.7 X lo-' M).The data show that the higher binding affinity of apo-E HDL, resulted from binding to multiple LDL receptors and that the binding affinity of complexes containing 1 active apo-E molecule was similar to the binding affinity of the apo-B-containing LDL.The original work of Goldstein and Brown (1) has shown that cultured human fibroblasts, as well as other cell types, possess specific receptors on their cell surface that bind to the apo-B-containing low density lipoproteins (LDL)' with high * The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part b. y the payment of page charges.
Pitas et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: