Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) demonstrated significantly greater sensitivity than the LD1/LD2 ratio for the late diagnosis of myocardial injury over a 5-day period (P < .05).
Observational (n=36)
Does cardiac troponin I (cTnI) testing improve sensitivity for the late diagnosis of myocardial injury compared to LD1/LD2 in patients admitted with myocardial infarction?
Cardiac troponin I is a more sensitive and cost-effective marker than LD1/LD2 for the delayed diagnosis of myocardial injury.
p-value: p=< .05
Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a highly specific marker that is elevated in the blood for several days following myocardial infarction. The lactate dehydrogenase (LD) isoenzyme 1 to isoenzyme 2 ratio (LD1/LD2) is the established marker for the late diagnosis of myocardial infarction. In this study, the sensitivity of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and LD1/LD2 were compared as late markers of myocardial injury over a 5-day period in 36 patients admitted with a diagnosis of myocardial infarction to the coronary care unit. Over this period, the sensitivity of cTnI was significantly greater than that of LD1/LD2 (P < .05). The concurrent elevation of both cardiac markers of the five day period range from 53.1% to 79.4%. However, this low concordance was largely due to an LD1/LD2 < 1 in the presence of an increased cTnI. The average discordance over the 5-day period was 29.5%. Because cardiac troponin I (cTnI) has greater sensitivity than lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes for delayed diagnosis of myocardial injury and is a more cost-effective test, the authors recommend it as a test of choice in this setting.
Martins et al. (Sun,) conducted a observational in Myocardial infarction (n=36). Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) vs. Lactate dehydrogenase (LD) isoenzyme 1 to isoenzyme 2 ratio (LD1/LD2) was evaluated on Sensitivity as late markers of myocardial injury (p=< .05). Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) demonstrated significantly greater sensitivity than the LD1/LD2 ratio for the late diagnosis of myocardial injury over a 5-day period (P < .05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: