The bridge girder’s aerodynamic configuration substantially governs its aerodynamic loading and wind-induced vibration characteristics. Extensive research has been performed to optimize the configuration of girders and implement aerodynamic measures to enhance the bridge’s wind resistance. In some practical bridge engineering projects, the aerodynamic configuration of the bridge girder is asymmetric. However, studies investigating the aerodynamic properties of asymmetric girders are limited. In this paper, the aerodynamic loading and vibration characteristics of the Π-shaped girders and box girders with asymmetric bikeways are experimentally studied. Through an extensive series of wind tunnel experiments, the static wind loading coefficients, flutter derivatives, vortex-induced vibration (VIV) responses, and the critical flutter velocities are compared across varying wind direction angles (WDAs). The experimental results demonstrate that the asymmetric girder configurations have different characteristics in both the static wind loading coefficient and flutter derivative in different WDAs. The influence of WDAs on the above-mentioned aerodynamic force coefficients of the asymmetric Π-shaped girder is more pronounced than that on the asymmetric box girder. For the asymmetric Π-shaped girder, the heaving VIV responses at a 0° WDA are smaller than those at a 180° WDA, but the torsional VIV responses at a 0° WDA are larger. Experimental results for critical flutter velocities indicate that the flutter performance at a 0° WDA is better than that at a 180° WDA, especially at positive angles of attack (AOAs) for the two types of asymmetric bridge girders.
Chen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: