This qualitative study explores contradictions in data quality assurance (DQA) practices within research data repositories (RDRs), interpreted through the lens of activity theory and data quality literature. It analyzes data from 32 interviews with curators and repository managers representing 32 repositories across 30 universities in the United States. The findings highlight several challenges faced by RDR staff, including differences in understanding DQA among stakeholders, the need for adequate resources, domain-specific knowledge, research expertise, and standardised data quality metrics. The study also identifies contradictions arising from misalignments in motivation between RDR staff and depositors and friction between the DQA practices of research labs and the standardised DQA models promoted by RDRs. In addition, it reveals contradictions between the RDRs’ infrastructures and curation models and the evolving needs of stakeholders. The article proposes resolution strategies for each identified contradiction.
Stvilia et al. (Fri,) studied this question.