PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2025Pharmaceutics1 citationsOpen Access

Comparative In Vitro Deposition Analysis of Formoterol, Glycopyrronium, and Tiotropium Delivered via Capsule-Based DPI

View Full Paper
ASAdam SikoraJCJoanna ChałupkaKLKinga Lewandowska

Key Points

  • The fine particle dose of aerosolized medications increased with higher flow rates, enhancing inhalation efficiency.
  • At 4 kPa pressure drop, both Aerolizer and Breezhaler surpassed Handihaler in delivering fine particle doses significantly.
  • Using the Next-Generation Impactor, aerodynamic performance was assessed, revealing trends in particle size distribution during inhalation tests.
  • Insights suggest that while non-dedicated inhalers may perform well in vitro, clinical guidelines must prioritize validated device combinations.

Abstract

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are the mainstay in the treatment of obstructive pulmonary diseases. However, the performance of DPI formulations is highly dependent on the used inhaler device and the patient’s inspiratory effort. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the aerosolization behavior of three commercially available capsule-based DPI medications—formoterol (Foradil®), glycopyrronium (Seebri® Breezhaler), and tiotropium (Spiriva®)—delivered using three different capsule-based inhalers (Aerolizer, Breezhaler, and Handihaler), under varying flow conditions. Methods: The aerodynamic performance of each formulation–inhaler combination was assessed using the Next-Generation Impactor (NGI) and Dosage Unit Sampling Apparatus (DUSA) methodology. Fine particle dose (FPD) and aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) were determined at fixed flow rates of 15, 30, 60, and 100 L/min, as well as at inhaler-specific flow rates corresponding to a 4 kPa pressure drop. Chromatographic quantification of active ingredients was performed using validated HPLC methods specific to each drug. Results: The FPD values increased consistently with higher flow rates across all tested formulations and inhalers. At a 4 kPa pressure drop, Aerolizer and Breezhaler achieved significantly higher FPDs compared to Handihaler. Notably, in some instances, non-dedicated inhalers produced greater respirable fractions than the originally intended devices. APSD profiles revealed that drug deposition shifted toward smaller NGI stages at higher inspiratory flows, supporting enhanced deep lung delivery potential under optimal conditions. Conclusions: Device resistance, capsule orientation, and piercing mechanics substantially influence drug aerosolization. Although non-dedicated inhalers may offer improved FPDs in vitro, clinical use should adhere to approved drug–device combinations, as these have been validated for efficacy and safety under real-world conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sikora et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af5418ad7bf08b1eadb737https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17091089
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Is Inhaler Technique Associated with Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?2020 · 10 citations
  2. 2Mendelian randomisation studies for causal inference in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A narrative review2025 · 8 citations
  3. 3Influence of Air Flow on the Performance of a Dry Powder Inhaler Using Computational and Experimental Analyses2005 · 176 citations
  4. 4A randomized, cross-over study comparing critical and overall errors, learning time, and preference of the ELLIPTA versus BREEZHALER dry powder inhalers in patients with asthma2022 · 7 citations
  5. 5Development of Novel Fluticasone/Salmeterol/Tiotropium-Loaded Dry Powder Inhaler and Bioequivalence Assessment to Commercial Products in Rats2025 · 3 citations