The handling of Rohingya refugees by Indonesia raises various legal issues, considering that Indonesia is not a party to the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees nor the 1967 Protocol. Nevertheless, Indonesia continues to serve as a transit country for refugees, which necessitates that its national policies take into account the principles of international law. This study aims to analyze the implications of international law, particularly the 1951 Convention, on Indonesia’s policies in dealing with Rohingya refugees. The research method employed is normative juridical, using statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were obtained through literature study of international legal instruments, national regulations, and official documents issued by the United Nations and UNHCR. The findings show that although Indonesia has not ratified the 1951 Convention, its core principles—such as non-refoulement, the protection of human rights, and the notion of international burden-sharing—have become part of customary international law and consequently influence national policy direction. Therefore, Indonesia continues to bear both a moral and legal responsibility to ensure humane treatment of refugees in accordance with international standards.
Hanifa et al. (Sat,) studied this question.