The Lower Congo Basin (LCB) and the Niger Delta Basin (NDB), two end-member deep-water systems along the West African passive margin, exhibit contrasting sedimentary architectures despite shared geodynamic settings. The research comprehensively utilizes seismic reflection structure, root mean square amplitude slices, drilling lithology, changes in logging curves, and previous research achievements to elucidate the controlling mechanisms behind these differences. Key findings include: (1) Stark depositional contrast: Since the Eocene, the LCB developed retrogradational narrow-shelf systems dominated by erosional channels and terminal lobes, whereas the NDB formed progradational broad-shelf complexes with fan lobes and delta-fed turbidites. (2) Primary controls: Diapir-driven topographic features and basement uplift govern architectural variability, whereas shelf-slope break configuration and oceanic relief constitute subordinate controls. (3) Novel mechanism: First quantification of how diapir-induced seafloor relief redirects sediment pathways and amplifies facies heterogeneity. These insights establish a tectono-sedimentary framework for predicting deep-water reservoirs in diapir-affected passive margins, refine the conventional “source-to-sink” model by emphasizing salt-geomorphic features coupling as the primary driver. By analyzing the differences in lithofacies assemblages and sedimentary configurations among the above-mentioned different basins, this study can provide beneficial insights for the research on related deep-water turbidity current systems and also offer guidance for deep-water oil and gas exploration and development in the West African region and other similar areas.
Qu et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: