Abstract - Background: Current adaptive learning systems typically focus on single dimensions of personalization and lack comprehensive integration of advanced AI techniques, limiting their effectiveness compared to human tutoring. Objective: This study develops and evaluates a modular AI-driven framework that integrates multi-dimensional learner modeling, hybrid content recommendation, real-time adaptation, and explainable AI components to improve learning outcomes over both traditional computer-assisted instruction and existing adaptive systems. Methods: We implemented a four-component framework using attention-enhanced LSTM networks for learner modeling, neural collaborative filtering with educational constraints for content recommendation, deep reinforcement learning for real-time adaptation, and causal reasoning for explainability. The framework was evaluated through a randomized controlled trial (N = 1,247 students) using the ASSISTments dataset, comparing against traditional CAI and a state-of-the-art adaptive baseline (DKT-based system). Primary outcomes included learning gains (pre-post assessments), knowledge retention (30-day follow-up), and engagement metrics, analyzed using mixed-effects models with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results: Compared to traditional CAI, the proposed framework showed moderate but significant improvements: learning effectiveness increased by 12.3% (d = 0.34, 95% CI 0.21, 0.47, p < 0.001), knowledge retention improved by 15.7% (d = 0.41, 95% CI 0.28, 0.54, p < 0.001), and engagement increased by 8.9% (d = 0.28, 95% CI 0.15, 0.41, p < 0.001). Compared to the adaptive baseline, improvements were smaller but significant: learning effectiveness (d = 0.22, p = 0.003), retention (d = 0.27, p < 0.001), and engagement (d = 0.19, p = 0.012). Ablation studies confirmed synergistic effects of integrated components. Conclusions: The comprehensive framework demonstrates statistically significant but modest improvements over existing approaches. While promising, the practical significance requires further validation across diverse educational contexts. Key Words: Adaptive Learning, Deep Learning, Educational Data Mining, Multi-Objective Optimization, Explainable AI, Randomized Controlled Trial
Dwivedi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: