This paper explores the relationship between intellectual capital and intangible cultural heritage, two interconnected yet distinct concepts. Intellectual capital refers to the intangible assets of organizations, encompassing human capital, structural capital, and relational capital, where IC contribute to value creation and competitive advantage. In contrast, intangible cultural heritage represents the collective cultural expressions, traditions, and knowledge passed down through generations within communities. While intangible cultural heritage may be considered a form of intellectual capital in a broader sense, key distinctions exist in terms of ownership, purpose, evolution, and protection mechanisms. Intellectual capital is typically owned by organizations and protected by intellectual property rights, whereas intangible cultural heritage belongs to communities and is characterized by its dynamic and evolving nature. Despite these differences, both concepts share common ground in knowledge preservation, value creation, and innovation. The study further examines the fields in which intangible cultural heritage is part of intellectual capital and the intersections where intangible cultural heritage could contribute to cultural capital and economic benefits, using Latvia's national intangible cultural heritage list and Upīte cultural space as a case study. In order to achieve this, a literature analysis will be conducted beforehand. By highlighting these distinctions and synergies, this paper underscores the need for nuanced approaches to the preservation and utilization of both intellectual capital and intangible cultural heritage.
Rozite Katrina Ponne (Fri,) studied this question.