Background: Wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) carpal tunnel release (CTR), performed in the clinic setting, has emerged as a safe, efficient, and cost-effective alternative to traditional operating room (OR)-based decompression. With increasing adoption in clinic settings, WALANT CTR offers the potential to improve access, reduce costs, and maintain excellent patient outcomes. Purpose: This clinical practice update provides an evidence-based summary of clinic-based WALANT CTR, including patient selection, procedural setup, safety profile, cost implications, and system-level considerations for implementation. Recent Findings: Multiple prospective and retrospective studies confirm the safety of WALANT CTR in the clinic setting, with complication rates comparable to OR-based procedures and no increase in surgical-site infections when field sterility is used. Cost analyses report a 70–85% reduction in facility costs per operative case, and patient satisfaction remains consistently high, even among those with anxiety disorders or psychiatric conditions. Adjunctive interventions such as virtual reality technology devices and noise-canceling headphones further enhance the awake surgical experience. Institutional adoption remains variable, with barriers including sterility concerns, billing uncertainty, and credentialing logistics. This clinical update offers detailed, practical guidance on implementing WALANT CTR for surgeons and staff, covering scheduling, staff training, clinical integration, billing, and compliance considerations. Summary: Clinic-based WALANT CTR is a high-value, patient-centered approach supported by a growing body of literature. With appropriate patient selection, streamlined workflows, and institutional support, this model can optimize surgical care delivery in both resource-rich and limited environments.
Stocker-Downing et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: