Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Summary Due to the limited real‐world research on the application of avatrombopag (AVA) for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in China, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of AVA in clinical practice. We included 121 adult ITP patients treated with AVA across three medical centres. Based on the reasons for choosing AVA, these patients were divided into eltrombopag (ELT)/hetrombopag (HET) intolerance group (IG), and ELT/HET unresponsive group (UG). Compared with UG, more patients in IG had a history of liver disease and received fewer treatments before AVA. Amongst all patients, 83% had platelet response (≥30 × 10 9 /L) after AVA and 62% achieved complete response (≥100 × 10 9 /L, CR). Sixty‐two percent in IG and 56% in UG were able to discontinue more than one concomitant ITP medication. A total of 17 patients underwent multiple switches of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO‐RAs), resulting in an 88% platelet response rate. Sixty‐three patients discontinued AVA, 27% were due to unaffordability. AVA was well tolerated in most patients. In the ITP population, AVA proved effective and safe, particularly in patients intolerant or unresponsive to ELT/HET. Patients benefited from TPO‐RAs switches, particularly those undergoing multiple switches. However, many patients struggled with the long‐term financial burden of AVA.
Tian et al. (Fri,) studied this question.