Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study scrutinized the historical evolution and legal complexities surrounding maritime boundary demarcation, examining the transition from traditional practices to contemporary international legal frameworks. Specifically, it has analyzed the impact of key legal doctrines on national interests, fairness, and cooperation, highlighting the transformation from equitable principles to normativity in maritime law. Central to the study were Bangladesh’s significant maritime boundary disputes with India and Myanmar, showcasing the challenges in applying delimitation principles and the intricate geopolitical and legal strategies employed to resolve these international conflicts. Meticulously analyzing crucial international cases, including the North Sea Continental Shelf case, has elucidated the practical application of theoretical principles. The research critically assessed the predictability of maritime delimitation, emphasizing the jurisprudence constant principle, the stability of the equidistance principle, and the influence of geographical and non-geographical factors. Concluding with actionable recommendations for past maritime boundary disputes and policymaking, it underscored the necessity for sustainable and equitable solutions under international law. Providing an in-depth examination of Bangladesh’s past maritime boundary issues and their global implications, the research has significantly contributed to academic discourse, offering practical guidance for policymakers and diplomats involved in maritime delimitation. The secondary research approach integrated historical analysis, legal review, and geopolitical assessment, relying on an extensive examination of international legal documents, treaties, court cases, scholarly literature, and expert commentary.
Hasan et al. (Mon,) studied this question.