Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The appointment and production of forensic psychological and philological examination research in Kazakhstan is carried out on the basis of a list of types of forensic examinations conducted by forensic examination bodies and expert specialties, qualifications for which are assigned by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The issue of the inadmissibility of raising legal issues before an expert in the theory of forensic examination is primarily related to the specifics of the expert's competence and the subject of forensic examination. The article analyzes legal issues that do not fall within the competence of an expert philologist in the appointment and conduct of a forensic psychological and philological examination in cases of offenses committed verbally – defamation disputes, insults, incitement to discord. Recommended sample questions for these categories of cases are provided.
Varenikova et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: