Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract For customer-oriented wood supply, buffering is required for flexibility to handle interactions in the wood procurement system. This includes balancing lead-time and operational cost by using stocks and production capacity as buffers. Despite the well-known challenge to balance the interactions between harvesting and forwarding in Nordic mechaniced CTL-operations, there has been limited research on how the machine groups can be staffed to enable flexibility and more focus on other measures to create flexibility. Therefore, this study explored trade-offs between wood lead-time and harvesting cost in the stump-to-roadside part of the wood supply chain by altering the numer of full-time working operators in the harvesting groups. This was done using discrete-event simulations implemented in Anylogic software. Input data included information about operational conditions in 1500 forest stands. The results revealed that the best balance was to have sufficient harvesting capacity to adjust wood lead times at the expense of increased harvesting costs. Of the tested options, the best balance was achieved when staffing a two-machine group with three operators, and thereby allocating 50% of the used work-shifts to regulating the field wood stock between the two machines. This resulted in the shortest lead times and the smallest harvesting cost increase. Compared to the option with no flexibility for stock adjustment (4 operators), the average lead-time could be reduced to one tenth at a cost increase of 3.4%. These findings have the potential to improve decisions of how harvesting groups are staffed to balance specific objectives of desired lead times and costs, which migh prove to be a valuable addition to the already used measures to manage wood flow.
Johansson et al. (Mon,) studied this question.