Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) face a potential risk of sarcopenia. Evidence suggests that chronic inflammation may contribute to its development, however data on the impact of the problem is limited. This knowledge gap emphasizes the need for additional research to contribute to the overall management improvement of these patients. The SARC-F questionnaire has been developed as a possible rapid diagnostic test for sarcopenia and it is recommended as a way of introducing the evaluation of this disease into clinical practice. Objectives: To analyze the prevalence of probable sarcopenia (PS) in a cohort of routinely managed AxSpA patients at a tertiary university hospital, and evaluate potential associated factors, as well as the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and diagnostic accuracy of SARC-F questionnaire in the detection of PS in these patients. Methods: A prospective study included patients meeting ASAS classification criteria, aged ≥ 50, excluding extreme disability cases (wheelchair-bound), from November 2022 to November 2023. PS was defined according to the latest European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP-2) consensus, in case of observing SARC-F ≥ 4 and grip strength Results: Seventy-five patients were included (74,7% male; mean age 64 ± 9 years; 36% smokers), with 65,3% engaging in regular exercise, and 9,3% having a history of fragility fracture. The majority of patients (81,3%) suffered ankylosing spondylitis. The frequency of PS was estimated at 9%. The mean SARC-F value was 2,3 ± 2,1. Fifty six patients (74,7%) presented a SARC-F Conclusion: Sarcopenia is a relevant comorbid condition in AxSpA, and a connection with disease activity, functionality and fatigue seems to exist. In practice, SARC-F is a valuable screening tool for the evaluation of sarcopenia in patients with AxSpA. Considering sarcopenia in the overall management of AxSpA might help improve clinical care of patients. Acknowledgements: NIL. Disclosure of Interests: None declared.
Berbel-Arcobé et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: