Relugolix prescribing practices and clinical experiences at an urban academic center.

e17008 Background: Relugolix is a novel oral GnRH antagonist that is now an alternative option for patients with prostate cancer (PC) who require androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The potential benefits of relugolix include rapid testosterone decline and recovery, oral administration, and a possible cardiovascular (CV) benefit compared to traditional GnRH agonists. This study examines real-world data on relugolix prescribing practices and clinical experiences at a large, urban academic center. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients with PC prescribed relugolix from March 2021 through December 2023 at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. We collected patient-related and clinical factors including demographics, comorbidities, CV risk factors, treatment history, reasons for relugolix prescription over GnRH agonists, medication compliance, adverse effects, and treatment outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the cohort. Results: Among 267 patients who received a relugolix prescription, median age was 70 years old, 186 patients (69.6%) were Non-Hispanic White, 37 (13.9%) Non-Hispanic Black, 13 (4.9%) Asian, and 6 (2.2%) Hispanic of any race. Across all patients, 228 (85.3%) initiated relugolix with a median therapy duration of 181 days (range: 10 - 807). At the time of prescription, 88 patients (32.9%) were prescribed concurrent androgen receptor signal inhibitors (ARSI) and 186 (69.6%) had localized disease. Median CV risk factors per patient was 2 (range 0 - 7), and 4 patients (1.5%) developed major adverse CV events (MACE), including acute heart failure decompensation, sick sinus syndrome, ventricular tachycardia, and death during treatment. Among physician prescribers, the most common reasons for prescribing relugolix included concern for CV risk (90 prescriptions, 33.3%) and patient preference for oral administration (55 prescriptions, 20.4%). Forty-nine patients (18.3%) were switched from a GnRH agonist, mainly due to physician concern for CV risk (13, 4.9%) or patient preference (17, 6.4%). Conclusions: We describe real-world use of relugolix for PC in a large, diverse single center cohort. The most frequent reasons for choosing relugolix over a GnRH agonist were physician concern for CV risk and patient preference for a tablet over injection. Investigations of treatment initiation and adherence in relation to insurance coverage, adverse effects, and socioeconomic factors require further investigation.