Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Patients with an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are selected to receive reperfusion therapy using either computed tomography (CT-CTA) or magnetic brain imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to compare CT and MRI as the primary imaging modality for AIS patients undergoing EVT. Methods: Data for AIS patients between January 2018 and January 2021 were extracted from two prospective multicenter EVT cohorts: the ETIS registry in France (MRI) and the OPTIMISE registry in Canada (CT). Demographics, procedural data and outcomes were collected. We assessed the association of qualifying imaging (CT vs. MRI) with time metrics and functional outcome. Results: From January 2018 to January 2021, 4059 patients selected by MRI and 1324 patients selected by CT were included in the study. Demographics were similar between the two groups. The median imaging-to-arterial puncture time was 37 minutes longer in the MRI group. Patients selected by CT had more favorable 90-day functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) as compared to patients selected by MRI (48.5% vs 44.4%; adjusted OR (aOR), 1.54, 95%CI 1.31 to 1.80, p<0.001). Conclusions: Patients with AIS undergoing EVT who were selected with MRI as opposed to CT had longer imaging-to-arterial-puncture delays and worse functional outcomes at 90 days.
Ducroux et al. (Fri,) studied this question.