Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
You have accessJournal of UrologyInfertility: Epidemiology pH (7.80±0.19 vs. 7.67±0.21), rapidly progressive sperm (45.89±21.00 vs. 36.92±18.15), and non-progressive sperm (6.87±9.45 vs. 7.36±5.53). CONCLUSIONS: The group with heteromorphisms is slightly younger than the controls and showed a higher percentage of rapidly progressive sperm and a lower percentage of non-progressive sperm. The frequency of chromosomal heteromorphisms in infertile men was 11.4% and did not negatively impact spermatogenesis. Download PPT Source of Funding: None © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e215 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Marcello Machado Gava More articles by this author Gabriel B. Silva More articles by this author Denise M. Christofolini More articles by this author Milton Ghirelli-Filho More articles by this author Ivan H. Yoshida More articles by this author Gustavo S. Lima More articles by this author Sidney Glina More articles by this author Caio P. Barbosa More articles by this author Bianca Bianco More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Gava et al. (Mon,) studied this question.