Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
each of the questions in Part A and Part B, as well as the anticipated guidance (AG) and anticipated position on rank list (RL) questions in Part C.Results: We gathered data from 1775 EM-bound applicants, comprising 3687 SLOEs.Table 1 demonstrates the distribution of scores for each component of the SLOE 2.0.The distributions of scores for each question showed a right-skewed distribution for Part A, Part B, and the AG and RL questions.Conclusion: To our knowledge, we presented the first preliminary data on distribution of scores using the SLOE 2.0.This data will be useful for EM programs to use when learning how to use and analyze SLOE 2.0 scores.This is preliminary data that requires many further studies.
Sielicki et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: