PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 9, 20241 citations

The impact of regional-scale variability in upper mantle viscosity on GIA in West Antarctica

View Full Paper
ELErica M. LucasNGNatalya GomezKLKonstantin Latychev

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

West Antarctica is underlain by a laterally heterogenous upper mantle, with localized regions of mantle viscosity reaching several orders of magnitude below the global average. Accounting for 3-D variability in upper mantle structure in glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) simulations has been shown to significantly impact the predicted spatial rates and patterns of crustal deformation, geoid and sea-level changes. Uncertainty in constraining the viscoelastic structure of the solid Earth remains a major limitation in GIA modeling. To date, investigations of the impact of 3-D Earth structure on GIA have adopted solid Earth viscoelastic models based on global- and continental-scale seismic imaging with variability at spatial scales >150 km. However, regional body-wave tomography shows mantle structure variability at smaller spatial scales (~50-100 km) in central West Antarctica (Lucas et al., 2020). Here, we investigate the effects of incorporating this smaller-scale lateral variability in upper mantle viscosity into 3-D GIA simulations. Lateral variability in upper mantle structure at the glacial basin scale is found to have a significant impact on GIA model predictions, especially in coastal regions undergoing rapid ice mass loss. For example, incorporating a transition from lower viscosity at the mouth of Thwaites Glacier to higher viscosity further upstream impacts the predicted rate and pattern of solid Earth deformation and sea-level change in response to ongoing and projected ice mass loss, with possible implications for the evolution of the overlying ice and the interpretation of geophysical observables.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lucas et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e74ce5b6db6435876c5b3bhttps://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-13928
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influence of Laterally Heterogeneous Mantle Viscosity Structure on the Signal of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in GRACE2024
  2. 23D Variations in Viscosity Reconcile the Strength of the Lower Mantle Inferred From Glacial Isostatic Adjustment and Mantle Convection2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3GIA‐Induced Mantle Circulation and Surface Horizontal Motions in North America: Effects of 3D Laterally Varying Elastic Thickness and Viscosity2026
  4. 4Mid-Holocene ice history inferred from GIA-induced crustal motion around Lützow-Holm Bay, East Antarctica2024
  5. 5GRACE and GRACE-FO constraints on 3D GIA models2024