Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The simulation and characterisation of randomly rough surfaces is an important topic in surface science, tribology, geo- and planetary sciences, image analysis and optics. Extensions to general random processes with two continuous variables are straightforward. Several surface generation algorithms are available, and preference for one or another method often depends on the specific scientific field. The same holds for the methods to estimate the fractal dimension D. This work analyses six algorithms for the determination of D as a function of the size of the domain, variance, and the input value for D, using surfaces generated by Fourier filtering techniques and the random midpoint displacement algorithm. Several of the methods to determine fractal dimension are needlessly complex and severely biased, whereas simple and computationally efficient methods produce better results. A fine-tuned analysis of the power spectral density is very precise and shows how the different surface generation algorithms deviate from ideal fractal behaviour. For large datasets defined on equidistant two-dimensional grids, it is clearly the most sensitive and precise method to determine fractal dimension.
Alarcón et al. (Thu,) studied this question.