March 7, 2024

Special Aspects of the Status of Territories of the Arctic Zone, Far North, Closed Administrative Territorial Structures in Files of the Judicial Practice

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The article uses the example of the practice of the courts of the Arkhangelsk Region and the Nenets Autonomous Okrug to consider the specifics of judicial disputes involving municipalities in the territories of the Arctic Zone and the Far North, closed administrative-territorial entities.

Bookmark

Cite This Study

Aleksey V. Kiselev (Thu,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e75683b6db6435876ce25d https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18572/2500-0349-2024-1-31-34

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Protection of Interests of Arctic Zone Residents2024
2Peculiarities of legal regulation of the territories of the Far Eastern Federal District and the Arctic zone with preferential treatment2025 · 1 citations
3The Development of Closed Administrative Territorial Structures and Border Territories: Special Aspects of the Organization of Local Self-Government within Their Boundaries2024
4Housing Policy in the Arctic Zone: Problems, Trends, and Prospects2026
5The municipal structure of Arctic regions: An agglomeration-based systems approach (A case study of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug)2024

Bookmark