This article explores the current specificities in the development of labor rights of public officials within local self-government bodies in Ukraine. It examines the impact of socio-political and legal trends on the formation and implementation of labor relations in the field of public administration. Particular attention is paid to the legal aspects of labor mechanisms under martial law, including legislative amendments regulating non-competitive appointments, restrictions on the duration of appointments, and new requirements related to military training for public officials. The study also analyzes the influence of decentralization reforms on labor relations in local self-government. It highlights the challenges of legal uncertainty caused by the dynamic evolution of labor legislation, as well as the risks of violating the principle of gender equality in decision-making processes related to staffing. The article reviews the provisions of current normative legal acts that govern the procedures of appointment, service, and dismissal of officials in this area. Special focus is given to recent legislative changes in Ukraine concerning the introduction of general military training requirements for public servants. The legal status of public officials during martial law is characterized, with consideration given to the temporary nature of appointments, statutory term limits, and legal restrictions on transfers to other positions. The article offers practical recommendations for improving the legislative framework and harmonizing labor legislation with international human rights standards and principles of sustainable human resource development. It includes elements of comparative analysis and assesses the contemporary challenges of ensuring the effective functioning of the local self-government system under crisis conditions. The necessity of modernizing the approaches to legal regulation of labor in local self-government bodies is substantiated, including the implementation of modern HR strategies, ensuring a balance between national security and human rights, and adapting legislation to new social realities. This study may be of practical interest to scholars, legislators, local government officials, and professionals in the field of labor law.
Y. V. Papuch (Tue,) studied this question.