ABSTRACT Objective Several species of New World cichlids have recently invaded reservoirs in Puerto Rico, potentially jeopardizing established recreationally important, albeit nonnative, sport fish populations. Interactions between invasive species and important sport fish must be understood so that they can be mitigated when feasible. This study compared monthly prey consumption between three invasive cichlids (Jaguar Guapote Parachromis managuensis and two species of Amphilophus) and two principal sport fishes (Largemouth Bass Micropterus nigricans and Butterfly Peacock Bass Cichla ocellaris) to understand potential for competitive interactions. Methods Stomach contents were evaluated quarterly using gastric lavage for sport fish and destructive sampling techniques for invasive species. Prey proportion by mass was calculated for each individual, and mean prey proportion by mass was calculated for each species by reservoir, month, and overall. Multivariate hypothesis testing using permutational multivariate analysis of variance and visualization of potential diet overlap were performed via analysis of variance and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), respectively. Results Fish were the most common prey type, and Threadfin Shad Dorosoma petenense was the most prevalent prey species. Although there were significant differences in diets of invasive cichlids and sport fishes (P 0.01), there also was considerable overlap based on low percentages of variation in diets explained by species (3–19% pseudo-R2) and NMDS visualizations. Diets varied little across reservoirs and months (≤4% pseudo-R2; high overlap in NMDS space). Conclusion These data indicate that the diet of Jaguar Guapote and Amphilophus spp. may overlap with that of sport fish populations in Puerto Rico. Jaguar Guapote relied on Threadfin Shad more than other species, with Amphilophus spp. relying more on detritus and noncrayfish invertebrates. Thus, if prey are limited, Jaguar Guapote may have a more direct effect via competition for prey. Finally, we report evidence of Largemouth Bass recruitment failure and local extirpations that support a hypothesis that invasive cichlids are having negative effects on at least Largemouth Bass, although the mechanism is unclear.
Neal et al. (Wed,) studied this question.