SUMMARY Global biodiversity is facing threats from climate change, habitat fragmentation, and anthropogenic activities—pressures that particularly endanger endemic and narrowly distributed species. In this study, the high‐quality chromosome‐level genomes of two ecologically divergent maples were assembled: the endangered and range‐restricted Acer tsinglingense (791.40 Mb) and its widespread congener Acer davidii (1291.99 Mb). Phylogenomic analysis indicates that the two species diverged ~16.3 million years ago, with A. tsinglingense showing notable gene family expansions in secondary metabolite pathways. Notably, the 3‐ketoacyl‐CoA synthase gene family, which is involved in nervonic acid biosynthesis, underwent significant expansion and tandem duplication in A. tsinglingense , exhibiting high expression in buds. Population genomic analysis revealed that, compared with the widely distributed A. davidii , A. tsinglingense possesses lower genetic diversity, higher harmful mutation load, and signatures of a severe population bottleneck during the Late Pleistocene. Genome–environment association analysis further identified climate‐adaptive genomic variations linked to five key environmental factors and projected potential genomic offsets under future climate scenarios. The southern lineage of A. tsinglingense exhibited greater climate sensitivity and genomic vulnerability under strong selective pressures, underscoring its importance as a conservation priority. Our research reveals that metabolic specializations in A. tsinglingense (such as the synthesis of nervonic acid) may confer competitive advantages in specific habitats. However, factors including its restricted distribution, historical population bottlenecks, and accumulated genetic load severely constrain its evolutionary potential to cope with rapid climate change. These findings emphasize the importance of elucidating the genomic basis and mechanisms of endangerment in metabolically specialized and threatened plant species to inform effective conservation strategies.
Meng et al. (Mon,) studied this question.