What type of study is this?

This is a Systematic Review study.

November 26, 2025Open Access

Supplemental imaging modalities for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts: A systematic review with economic considerations

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Standard mammography often fails to detect cancers in women with dense breasts. Supplementary MRI provides better detection than DBT, ABUS, and HHUS. CEM seems comparable to MRI, based on limited evidence. These findings should be considered in future screening policy reviews for women with dense breasts.

Read Full Paperexternally

Perguntar à IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shaun Treweek (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694035e12d562116f2908ada https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2025.104668

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1ESR Essentials: screening for breast cancer - general recommendations by EUSOBI2024 · 51 citations
2Comparative Effectiveness of Combined Digital Mammography and Tomosynthesis Screening for Women with Dense Breasts

Perguntar à IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper