PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 6, 2026Applied Sciences1 citationsOpen Access

Iterative Requirements-Driven Business Process Modeling and Verification with Large Language Models

View Full Paper
HXHeng XieFNFeng NiJLJiang Liu

Key Points

  • This study aims to create an effective modeling framework to convert unstructured requirements into structured business process models.
  • Developed a framework to manage requirements from extraction to verification.
  • Utilized large language models for generating structured requirements models from textual input.
  • Employed formalized mapping rules and a merging algorithm for iterative requirements handling.
  • Implemented a static flow error verification algorithm alongside reachability verification using CPN tools.
  • Demonstrated improved alignment between requirements and business process modeling.
  • Proven higher quality in generated structured models through comparative experiments.
  • Validated the framework's effectiveness with a two-step case study verification.

Abstract

Contemporary business process modeling lacks a systematic framework for converting unstructured requirements into structured models. Traditional manual approaches fail to support integrated lifecycle management from requirements elicitation to iterative model refinement. The gap severely limits the efficiency and accuracy of the alignment between requirements and business process modeling and often leads to costly rework and implementation errors in complex software projects. Therefore, this paper aims to establish a coherent modeling framework from requirements extraction to business process model verification. The framework maintains the traceability and consistency of the unstructured requirements through three tasks: (1) automatic generation of a structured requirements model from textual input to a set of designed prompts of hyperparameter-optimized large language models (LLMs); (2) establishment of a modeling routine to handle the iterative requirements via two sets of formalized mapping rules, a merging algorithm, and a toolkit; (3) detection of the obtained CBPMN model by a static flow error verification algorithm and reachability verification using CPN tools 4.0. A total of 15 sets of comparative experiments with three state-of-the-art automated modeling approaches demonstrate the superiority of our method in generating higher-quality requirements models, while an additional case study with two-step verification proves its validity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695d854b3483e917927a45fbhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16010518
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper