Neuroanatomy is essential in clinical neurology for localization and differential diagnoses, yet the pace of residency can limit time to reinforce foundational concepts. This proof-of-concept study aimed to examine neurology residents’ perceptions of the acceptability (e.g., ease of use, engagement, educational value, and practicality of implementation) of a guided virtual reality (VR) neuroanatomy learning experience. The authors worked closely with the information technology (IT) department to address technical issues, including having a dedicated Wi-Fi signal with sufficient strength, preventing headset network switching, and avoiding institutional firewalls. Five neurology residents (n=5) completed a 40-minute guided VR session using the Organon software on an Oculus Quest 3 headset, covering cerebrovascular arterial supply, cerebral venous sinuses, ventricular anatomy, and major cortical structures. Residents completed pre- and post-sessions surveys that included questions about their perceptions of the VR experience and open-ended questions. Participants also completed knowledge quizzes at pre-session, immediate post-session, and 3-week follow-up, as a secondary, exploratory outcome. Overall, residents reported the VR experience as user-friendly and engaging and offered actionable suggestions to enhance its implementation and instructional value for advanced learners. The results of the knowledge quizzes are informative and useful for refining the protocol and informing a larger cohort to better characterize acceptability and implementation within neurology residency training.
Bass et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: