What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to develop a novel method, pRef-IFS, to estimate metabolite-corrected plasma input functions non-invasively.

January 18, 2026

“Pseudo-reference-based Input Function Shape” (pRef-IFS): Towards a True image-derived input function for PET kinetic modeling

Key Points

This research aims to develop a novel method, pRef-IFS, to estimate metabolite-corrected plasma input functions non-invasively.
Utilized a pseudo-reference region described by a one-tissue compartment model.
Estimated clearance rates using either simplified reference tissue models or a priori assumptions.
Scaled the plasma input function with an early image-derived blood time-activity curve.
The method showed unbiased estimates in one-tissue kinetics; pRef-IFS demonstrated small bias in real data.
Specific biases included cerebellum (−2 ± 5%) and thalamus (11 ± 8%) for 11C-LSN3172176.
In two-tissue kinetics, pRef-IFS underperformed, particularly for 18F-FPEB, with 18F-ASEM yielding small biases (−4 ± 10%).

Abstract

PET absolute quantification requires the metabolite-corrected plasma input function ( C P ), especially when an ideal reference region is unavailable. We propose “pseudo-Reference-based Input Function Shape” (pRef-IFS), a novel non-invasive method to estimate C P from PET data in two steps: (1) generating the unscaled C P shape from a pseudo-reference region (pRef) described by a one-tissue (1T) compartment model, with the pRef clearance rate k 2 ′ either estimated with simplified reference tissue models (SRTM) or assumed a priori ; (2) scaling C P with an early image-derived blood time-activity curve (ID-BTAC). We here explored the first step (assuming accurate step-2 scaling), evaluating the impact of violating 1T assumptions and inaccurate k 2 ′ estimates on pRef-IFS recovery with both synthetic and human data. The distribution volumes ( V T ) were the main outcome measure. With 1T kinetics, SRTM k 2 ′ was unbiased, irrespective of pRef specific binding; pRef-IFS had small V T bias in real data: 11 C-LSN3172176 (cerebellum pRef: −2 ± 5%; thalamus: 11±8%); 18 F-SynVesT-1 (centrum semiovale: −1 ± 14%; cerebellum: 6 ± 4%). With two-tissue kinetics, pRef-IFS performed poorly, especially with 18 F-FPEB, while 18 F-ASEM produced small biases (cerebellum: −4 ± 10%). If good scaling with ID-BTAC can be achieved, pRef-IFS promises to be fully non-invasive for radiotracers reasonably described by 1T kinetics, even with modest specific binding in the pRef.

Perguntar à IA

Bookmark