PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 21, 2026Horticulturae2 citationsOpen Access

Flowering Phenograms and Genetic Sterilities of Ten Olive Cultivars Grown in a Super-High-Density Orchard

View Full Paper
FMFrancesco MalderaFNFrancesco NicolìSGSimone Pietro Garofalo

Key Points

  • Investigate flowering phenograms, gynosterility, and self-compatibility of ten olive cultivars in a Super-High-Density orchard.
  • Conducted a three-year field study in southern Italy
  • Analyzed flowering phenograms and self-compatibility
  • Assessed gynosterility differences among cultivars and canopy positions
  • Flowering overlap exceeded 70% in most cultivar combinations for effective pollination
  • Gynosterility values varied, with 'I-77' showing the highest at 71.4%
  • 'Frantoio' and 'Arbequina' identified as reliable pollinizers
  • Significant variability in fruit set was observed, from 0.5% in 'I-77' to 4.7% in 'Arbosana'
  • Ranked cultivars based on reproductive aptitude, with 'Cima di Bitonto' and 'Frantoio' as the most fertile.

Abstract

The introduction of Super-High-Density (SHD) olive orchards represents a crucial innovation in modern olive growing, enhancing sustainability. However, the long-term success of these planting systems depends strongly on cultivar selection, combining suitable vegetative and reproductive traits. This three-year field study investigated key floral biology parameters—flowering phenograms, gynosterility, and self-compatibility—of ten olive cultivars grown under irrigated conditions in southern Italy: ‘Arbequina’, ‘Arbosana’, ‘Cima di Bitonto’, ‘Coratina’, ‘Don Carlo’, ‘Frantoio’, ‘Favolosa’ (=‘Fs-17’), ‘I-77’, ‘Koroneiki’, and ‘Urano’ (=‘Tosca’). Flowering phenograms varied significantly across years and cultivars, showing temporal shifts related to chilling accumulation and yield of the previous year. Early blooming cultivars (‘Arbequina’, ‘Arbosana’, and ‘Coratina’) exhibited partial flowering overlap with mid-season ones, enhancing cross-pollination opportunities. Quantitative analysis of flowering overlap revealed that most cultivar combinations exceeded the 70% threshold required for effective pollination, although specific genotypes (‘Coratina’, ‘Fs-17’, and especially ‘I-77’) showed critical mismatches, while ‘Frantoio’ and ‘Arbequina’ emerged as the most reliable pollinizers. Gynosterility exhibited statistical differences among cultivars and canopy positions: ‘I-77’ showed the highest values (71.4%), while ‘Coratina’ and ‘Cima di Bitonto’ showed the lowest ones (7.3 and 8.4%, respectively). The median portions of the canopies generally displayed a greater number of sterile flowers (29.4%), reflecting the combined effect of genetic and environmental factors such as light exposure. In the inflorescence, the majority of gynosterile flowers were concentrated in the lower part, for all canopy portions (modal value). Self-compatibility tests were performed considering a fruit set of 1% as a threshold to discriminate. For open pollination, the fruit set was highly variable among cultivars, ranging from 0.5% in ‘I-77’ to 4.7% in ‘Arbosana’. Apart from ‘I77’, all varieties achieved a fruit set greater than 1%. Instead, for the self-pollination, only ‘Arbequina’, ‘Koroneiki’, ‘Frantoio’, and ‘Cima di Bitonto’ could be identified as pseudo-self-compatible, whereas ‘Coratina’, ‘Fs-17’, and the others were clearly self-incompatible and therefore unsuitable for monovarietal orchards in areas with limited availability of pollen. By integrating self-compatibility and gynosterility data, the cultivars were ranked according to reproductive aptitude, identifying ‘Cima di Bitonto’ and ‘Frantoio’ as the most fertile genotypes, whereas ‘Don Carlo’ and particularly ‘I-77’ showed severe genetic sterility constraints. The findings underline the critical role of floral biology in defining reproductive efficiency and varietal adaptability in SHD systems. This research provides valuable insights for optimizing cultivar selection, orchard design, and management practices, contributing to the development of sustainable, climate-resilient olive production models for Mediterranean environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maldera et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69706ce9b6488063ad5c1b0chttps://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12010110
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Canopy Architectural Characteristics of Ten New Olive (Olea europaea L.) Genotypes and Their Potential for Cultivation in Super-High-Density Orchards2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Agronomic Characteristics of Several Italian Olive Cultivars and Evaluation for High-Density Cultivation in Central Italy2025
  3. 3Manual pollination of non-self-pollinating Arbequina olive trees using three pollen-donor cultivars2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Architectural and Agronomic Evaluation of Some Wild Italian Genotypes of <i>Olea europaea</i> L. From Sardinia in High‐Density Planting2026
  5. 5Arbosana Olive Is Self-Incompatible, but Inter-Compatible with Some Other Low-Vigor Olive Cultivars2024 · 7 citations