Despite more than three decades of recurrent engagement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Pakistan continues to experience persistent balance-of-payments crises, suggesting that stabilization programs have failed to generate durable macroeconomic stability. Existing accounts either emphasize domestic policy failures or treat IMF conditionality as an externally imposed constraint, but rarely analyse how misaligned adjustment programs interact with domestic power structures and long-term constraints on economic convergence. This dissertation explains Pakistan’s repeated recourse to IMF programs by examining the interaction between domestic ruling-elite configurations, IMF structural adjustment frameworks, and enduring structural impediments to development. The study employs a theoretical framework drawing on Gramscian and Neo-Gramscian political economy, alongside Dani Rodrik’s theory of economic convergence and growth diagnostics. Methodologically, the research adopts a mixed-methods design grounded in critical political economy, combining semi-structured elite interviews with policymakers, economists, and academics, analysed through systematic content analysis, with a descriptive illustration of key macroeconomic indicators related to balance-of-payments dynamics, public debt, exchange rate, and long-term growth performance. The findings demonstrate that Pakistan’s recurrent IMF engagements are driven by enduring structural weaknesses rooted in elite ruling class factions, weak fiscal capacity, and ineffective industrial policy, and that these weaknesses are reinforced by IMF stabilization programs that are insufficiently adapted to domestic institutional, political, and developmental conditions. While IMF programs have provided short-term liquidity and crisis management, their standardized policy prescriptions have not facilitated structural transformation or sustained economic convergence. The dissertation contributes to international political economy and development economics by showing that repeated IMF dependence reflects a politically mediated development trap shaped by the interaction of domestic power relations and international adjustment regimes.
Ihtesham ul Haq (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: