Abstract. The Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite Limb Profiler (OMPS LP) was launched onboard the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (SNPP) satellite in 2011 and began routine science operations in April 2012. The OMPS LP uses measurements of scattered solar radiation in the ultraviolet, visible and near infrared wavelengths to retrieve high vertical resolution profiles of ozone from 12 km (or cloud tops) up to 57 km. In mid-2023, version 2.6 of the OMPS LP ozone profile retrievals was released, featuring improvements in calibration, retrieval algorithm, and data quality. We evaluate OMPS LP version 2.6 ozone retrievals using correlative data from other satellite instruments and ground based data for the period April 2012 to April 2024. Our results show agreement between OMPS LP and all correlative data sources between 20 and 50 km at all latitudes with differences of less than 10 %, with OMPS generally exhibiting a negative bias, except between 32 and 38 km in the tropics and southern mid-latitudes, where the bias is positive. In the tropics and southern mid-latitudes the differences between OMPS LP and MLS, and OMPS LP and SAGE III/ISS are less than ±5 % between 20 and 45 km. Above 50 km, the agreement with MLS is still on the order of −5 % or better. Larger positive biases, up to ∼ 35 %, are seen in the upper troposphere lower stratosphere layer (∼ 15 to 20 km) between approximately 40° S and 40° N. We find that OMPS version 2.6 ozone exhibits the same seasonal cycle as compared to all correlative measurement sources and our analysis shows that there is no significant seasonal bias in OMPS LP. We find drifts relative to correlative observations at all latitude bands of less than ±2 % per decade (±1 % per decade) between 25 and 50 km for the 2012–2024 period, with larger drifts above 50 km and below 20 km. These drifts vary between correlative measurements and straddle the zero line, we therefore conclude that there is no significant systematic drift in OMPS LP version 2.6 ozone for the period 2012 to 2024. The drift results represent an improvement in the long term stability of version 2.6 ozone over that of version 2.5.
Richards et al. (Wed,) studied this question.